Enhancing learning outcomes through digital assessment in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65881/innovation.v1i1.46Keywords:
digital assessment, learning outcomes, student engagement, higher-order thinking skills, self-regulated learningAbstract
Purpose: to explore the impact of digital assessment on university students’ learning outcomes in higher education.
Method: this study used a qualitative descriptive-exploratory design conducted at Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observation, and document analysis involving one lecturer and one student. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis with an interactive model, and trustworthiness was ensured through triangulation and ethical procedures.
Findings: digital assessment enhances students’ learning outcomes by increasing engagement, providing real-time feedback, and fostering higher-order thinking skills such as critical thinking and problem-solving. It also supports self-regulated learning through greater flexibility and learner autonomy. However, challenges such as limited digital literacy, internet instability, and pedagogical design constraints were identified as barriers to optimal implementation.
Implications: digital assessment can be an effective pedagogical strategy to enhance learning outcomes in higher education when supported by adequate infrastructure, digital literacy, and well-designed assessment practices. It highlights the importance of integrating technology, pedagogy, and institutional support to optimize student engagement, feedback quality, and skill development.
Originality: this study offers a holistic view of digital assessment as a pedagogical strategy that enhances learning outcomes beyond technical or perception-based perspectives.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 INNOVATION: Journal of Education and Learning

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Abstract views: 34
|
PDF downloads: 19














